Posted By:
davidcyclebackI don't know, but I would think that a grading company would label it as a wrong back.
A key for the valuation for the Ruth is the population of 1933 Goudey wrong backs or wrong backs in general for cards from that error. The prevelance is something I don't know. I know you can find 1962 wrong backs or upside down backs, but don't know about Goudeys. If wrong backs are rare for Goudeys, I would think a collector would have a heavy premium for it.
One thing about printing errors is that collectors tend to either find them really cool or they don't like them at all. I had a 1962 Topps wrong back. Some collectors were willing to pay extra for it, because it was an error and errors are cool. Others thought it should be worth less than normal, just like a miscut card is worth less.