Posted By:
al davisin some ways might it not be better to remain anonymous and be judged solely by our logic and reason? just because someone has a certain name, profession, or group of associates doesn't necessarily influence my judgement of his ability to explain reality. maybe if i knew that vikes was some nose-picking creep from the backwoods i might foolishly ignore his credible arguments. being anonymous certainly removes the built-in prejudice that many people seem to have. why do we have to treat everything on this board as though we are delivering closing arguments in front of the Supreme Court? we should be grateful that we have the latitude to express ourselves, whoever we may be.