[Archive]

Posted By: Anonymous

Perhaps one of the attorneys can explain why holding PSA hostage for thousands of dollars could be a suitable form of punishment for their negligence and to encourage them to institute more (some) rigorous QA procedures.

Personally, I think their decertifying a card they don't own is wrong. As long as the card is in the general marketplace, I think they have a legal duty to maintain that certification number. Once they own the card, they can do whatever they like. But people pay a lot of money for that certification number and like other have stated, PSA shouldn't have the ability to eliminate the existance of something you have purchased, at their whim.