Posted By:
PASJDHold on here folks, I think I am seeing Bill Clinton's deposition again (depends what the meaning of "is" is). An item auctioned as a "Ty Cobb game used bat" with a certificate of authenticity does NOT necessarily mean the seller and authenticators are representing that Ty Cobb used the bat in a game? Sorry folks I am just a dumb lawyer but I couldn't sell that verbal dance to a jury in a million years even if it was in the fine print somewhere. What am I missing here? And I agree with Robert, Bill it would enhance your credibility in all of our eyes if you did not hide behind a screen of anonymity. Robert has told us his name and who he is, so if you want us to believe you and not him (presumably the purpose of your posts or you would have just emailed Robert privately) then I think you should identify yourself and give us your credentials.