Posted By:
Bottom of the NinthPlease take more information out of context. As stated a few posts above I used the word "altered" in a one sentence summary in my e-mail to Scott about a conversation that took place between me and my buyer. Had I know that I was going on trial I certainly would have videotaped the entire transaction.
You are almost too unreasonable to even address so I will not comment on some of your other inanities.
Scott,
"only one problem your logic Greg October 12 2004, 3:00 PM
I thought you were lying."
Well, again you thought wrong and drew yet another conclusion without any foundation.
"but by constantly bringing that up October 12 2004, 4:23 PM
it really sounds like you were relying on everyone else keeping mum while you did whatever it took to pawn off that Cobb...on someone who doesn't normally read this board."
Again you draw a conclusion without having any first hand knowledge of what took place with my customer. Even after being notified by me that a sale took place.
Whether or not the card was altered, I sold it as such and based on the price paid it was bought with full knowledge of the accompanying story. I understand that $200 or even $750 is a great deal of money to you so I can understand from your POV why you might think that I would attempt to deceive someone for such incredible wealth. You got the wrong guy though.