[Archive]

Posted By: warshawlaw

Greg: "Bottom feeder": Is that in reference to my job? Not very creative... I don't buy your story. Bottom line: it is one thing to say you aren't sure about the card so you want a third party's opinion, but you knew the history of the card and sold it without disclosing it. That's fraudulent and you don't need to debate the meaning of "is" to come to that conclusion. I also don't believe for a moment that SGC offered to buy out the card only because we criticized SGC here. We don't have that kind of juice. We bag on PSA, SGC and GAI all the time and nothing comes of it. The more I hear the less sense you make, so I'm done with you and with this thread.

Grading: I've been saying for a long time that a grader cannot be expected to pick up on a removal and that the services make mistakes. We all do. That's not the point. The real issues are whether the services add a value to the business and whether they stand behind their service. As to the former, I believe they do add value and are here to stay, and people who complain about the concept of grading per se need to face reality. As far as standing behind their services, I for one am glad to hear that SGC allegedly offered to stand behind its service. If that is true, it is heartening.