Posted By:
hankronThe problem with this 'debate' (I supose we could debate if the color blue is blue too), is that my assesment of these proofs is accurate, and those who disagree are ingorant. It's as simple as that. You can argue with me about this, but you'd be wrong.
Only for the sake of argument in this paragraph, let's say the proofs are authentic. Why hasn't the AM auction description been ammended to say that these were owned by Seth N. and he stated publicly that he had these chopped down from a larger piece? I haven't collected cards in a while, but I've been under the assumtion that things like trimming and altering (cutting a thing into four smaller pieces being an example of alteration) were of significance in the trading card hobby. Has AM decided that these things are mere technicalities that should be withheld from potential bidders? What other things and kinds of things has AM decided are mere technicalites that should be witheld? In which lots?