[Archive]

Posted By: Fred Y

I assume you looked carefully at all the views on Angela's listing. Couldn't the answer be simply that the sig was added at a slightly later time in 1928 or '29 (like a few months or so) w/a different pen?







I had a Ruth-Gehrig ball that was deemed authentic but enhanced by Spence that I sold w/ Lelands in 2005--That one was evident. This Gehrig looks untouched to me.

Here is a litle better pic to judge by:








Can you state EXACTLY WHY you think it is not good?



Would love to have Jodi or anyone else familiar w/ Gehrig sig to offer their opinions.