[Archive]

Posted By: davidcycleback

Agree with Barry. This one is a nice, but average late 1800s example. The one in the B & L auction was a classic 1860s example, with 1860s being early. The main value difference between the two is the ages, with earlier being rarer. 90+ percent of baseball tintypes have unidentified players, so, unless its a famous player or team, identification is not a big issue.