[Archive]

Posted By: slacks

Pete, this discussion began with my assertion that:

"Sans serif fonts are not inherently any easier to read than serif fonts."

to which you wrote: "Absolutely not true." I take that to mean that you think that sans serif fonts ARE inherently more readable.

Your last post seems to counter this comment by admitting that there are many other factors that determine readability. No kidding. That was my point exactly.

And I never said that newspapers used Times. Why don't we take this to e-mail?