Posted By:
CyclebackThe general distinction concerns what someone has to say. If an anonymous newbie asks whether or not Hal Chase is a member of the Hall of Fame, it's unlikely that anyone will object. If an anonymous newbie posts that so-and-so stole money and trims cards, it's a different situation.
When someone anonymously posts wild accusations, I automatically disreguard the accusations. If the person is unwilling to stand behind what he says, why should he expect me or anyone else to have faith in the the accuracy of his statements? It's so easy and inviting to make stuff up when no one knows who you are.