Posted By:
warshawlawHere are some excerpts from this turkey's argument in favor of this card:
"if you are trying to past something off as genuine you want make a little mistake as to leave solid black pinstripe out or not printing the name of the player in solid brown ink. A blind man can see those mistake."
--Yes, indeed, the mistakes made in this card were obvious to any experienced T206 collector. Why? Because the card is a REPRINT made with the obvious intent of NOT defrauding anyone. The differences this guy highlights are the equivalent of stamping "reprint" on it.
"Now reader you clearly see that there are three sides to a story( my side, the grading industry side and the true side of this story)."
--????? The truth apparently is separate from this fellow's story!!
The web site is chock full of grammatical and spelling errors too. We also get the ubiquitous reference to an unnamed printing expert who has reviewed and authenticated the card, obviously inaccurate recitations of the procedures of PSA, etc. It makes absolutely no sense at all, except in the context of an elaborate fraud.