Posted By:
Jeff OI promised myself I wouldn't get involved in this thread... but oh well, here it goes.
First let me say that to the best of my knowledge I have never had any dealings with either of the two parties involved in this dispute.
Jerry, if the scenario as you describe it is true, and I have no reason to believe that it is not, I completely agree that you were the victim of a material misrepresentation (insurance talk for "fraud"). I also find the "restocking" fee that you were charged a complete and total joke, as it is way out of line.
That being said, why the animosity towards Julie and Trevor in your last post? You go after Julie for creating some kind of "hypothesis"... I re-read her posting a dozen times. All that I get out of it is that she is relating a story similar to yours told to her by someone else who dealt with the same seller. I don't think that she is in any way disputing your description of the events - if anything her post confirms what you are alleging.
And as for your comments toward Trevor... all he did was relate his experiences with the same seller. Because he had positive experience while you did not, you ask how he can be a "fair juror"? How can he be any more or less fair than anyone else who has posted on this thread? He simply stated his personal experience... assuming he is telling the truth, and I assume that he is, what's wrong with that?
Anyway... just my two cents worth. I hate to see people discredited for no reason.
Jeff