Posted By:
MWKenny,
Some good suggestions.
On a side note, here are two of the dumbest things I've read so far about this unfortunate situation -- posted on the CU forum:
"I'm sure that PSA's defense attorneys would argue that Mr. McKee was negligent for not sending it registered."
(My note: they could, but that would be totally irrelevant to the case. The issue would be the care with which PSA received the package and accounted for its contents. Unless I'm mistaken, a simple objection would over-rule any mention of Dan's so-called negligence).
"Whether a video tape was running at the time the package was opened is irrelevant if the person doesn't know if the tape is running or not. In other words, as long as the person thinks he's being video taped then it's highly unlikely he would attempt to commit this crime."
(My note: I can think of no dumber argument than this one. Can you imagine an attorney representing PSA and trying to logically advance such a rationale for not providing better security? It's truly mind-boggling to me what random and desperate thoughts spring from such mentally idle minds).