[Archive]

Posted By: warshawlaw

Most laypeople don't understand the difference between types of evidence. Dan swearing under penalty of perjury that he went through the sequence of conduct we've been discussing IS evidence. Direct testimonial eyewitness evidence. What you and many others are fixating on is documentary evidence--paperwork, photographs, film, etc. Any court would accept Dan's testimony as evidence. Once given, the burden would be on PSA to disprove Dan's evidence. As I pointed out, PSA cannot do this because it cannot prove what happened when the package got to their office. I seriously doubt that anyone at PSA can accurately testify as to what was in the box because I doubt that anyone at PSA can even be shown to have opened it (my experience is that a company that processes lots of orders can point you to who was on duty that day, but that the individuals cannot testify accurately as to precisely what they did on their shifts).