[Archive]

Posted By: brian parker

Anyone who has dealt with Bob (I have on many occasions in the past) knows that he is honest, upstanding man of his word. If he says that there was no ink mark on the border (this one would not be missed unless you were Mr. Magoo), then it was not there when he sent it in to be graded. The mark, whether accidently or purposefully administered, would have to have come while in the possession of SGC, and thus Bob should be compensated for his loss. Ideally Bob will be able to come up with a scan of the card in its prior state, but even if he is unable, I think SGC should step up to the plate and take financial responsibility on this one.

Just thought I would mention that I am anti-card grading from way back, and this just gives me another reason to scoff at the whole concept.

Brian