View Single Post
  #25  
Old 12-17-2002, 09:29 PM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default opinions on this situation please

Posted By: MW

In its most common or ordinary usage, the qualifier "as is" is generally applied to language, services or a specific product where there is potential liability on the part of the seller. That liability is often distinguished by the fact that, in the case of some commodities or goods, the items offered are not in "new" condition. That is, they have been subjected to a degree of use or wear that could possibly void a prior warranty or guarantee. In such cases, the words "as is" are appropriately substituted.

Therefore, I tend to agree with David. "As is" is most meaningful when applied to a baseball card's condition or state of wear, NOT the authenticity. Those who are not familiar with how to grade vintage cards might appropriately write that a card is sold "as is." In other words, the corners may be rounded or it may have some creases, but degradation of condition does not cause a card to become bogus or counterfeit. To imply or suggest that "as is" can be properly applied as a solution to authenticity concerns does not seem to be a proper remedy (or excuse).

Before buying any item of questionable authenticity, I think the following questions need to be asked -- (1) Do you (as the seller) believe this item to be original and authentic? (2) Has anyone suggested to you that it might not be? (3) Has any other circumstance led you to believe that it might not be? (4) Have you (as the seller) ever offered ANY OTHER ITEM OR MERCHANDISE where the authenticity was unknown prior to the final sale?

Finally, I believe this subject has been already discussed, but the mindlessly rhetorical sales inclusion of "sold as is" SHOULD NOT BE a proper substitute for a little bit of research, a 5-minute phone call, or an email with an attached image.

Reply With Quote