[Archive]

Posted By: brian parker

I ordered one of these back in 1993 and actually was so disappointed I returned it with a note listing all the errors and ommissions when comparing it to their vintage listings in their 1993 Standard catalog. They actually only added a handful of set listings, and I felt at the time it was a big rip-off, because it failed to add much coverage on the unusual issues from the time span it was supposed to cover.

Admittedly it would be nice to have this same narrow focus concept now with all the new information they have added to their Standard Catalog in the years since (and not have to lug around all the additional weight of the new issues).

Brian