[Archive]

Posted By: David

Pete, while agreeing with your and Doug's final verdict on Mr. Ruelbach and his magical sneeze guard, I think your definition of proof is too exclusive to be entirely accurate. While the so-called scraps or printer's waste is excluded, the definition of proof encompasses a wider and wilder variety of purposes and prints than you might accept. I suspect that our potential difference in opinion is because you were in commercial printing, while my background was in fine art. Naturally, you may bring up that the T205s were commercial printing, and that is an accurate and worthwile point.