View Single Post
  #19  
Old 02-04-2002, 09:07 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default Confused about grading vs. authenticating

Posted By: MW

Marc --

Let's say you are an experienced hobby veteran who sells both graded and ungraded cards and I'm a novice who's interested in buying graded material. Imagine the following dialogue:

MW: "Hi Marc! I really like the idea of buying graded cards. What can you tell me about them?"

Marc: "Well, there are many different grading companies, but for vintage cards, I would highly recommend SGC."

MW: "Sounds great! How does this grading thing work?"

Marc: "Well...a company such as SGC receives a group of cards from collectors or dealers and evaluates them based on condition. If the card is unaltered, then they encapsulate it and assign a grade to it."

MW: "So cards that are trimmed or bleached or repapered don't get graded."

Marc: "Well...SGC actually grades those too. They're just labeled differently."

MW: "So let me get this straight -- a grading company at first rejects a group of cards and then decides to encapsulate and grade them?"

Marc: "Yes."

MW: "Do other companies grade altered cards?"

Marc: "Well, yes. PRO, ASA and NASA among others."

MW: "So these are good companies too?"

Marc: "No. Companies that grade altered cards are not popular with serious collectors."

MW: "Then why should I trust a company that puts altered cards in holders? How do I know that some of the altered cards aren't getting in the unaltered holders? This makes me nervous."

Marc: "But encapsulating altered cards is a good thing. Otherwise they'd never be graded."

MW: "Isn't that the point?"

Reply With Quote