[BillyCoxDodgers3B]

I like dealing with these nice folks but you have to take their grading with a grain of salt, instead using the scans provided to make your own determinations.

Their note you mentioned regarding there being a reason why a nice looking card seems undergraded should be taken into consideration, however. Other grades, not so much in my experience. I generally concur with their raw grades about 70% of the time. Not terrible, I guess, but these are for raw grades only and not to be held up against PSA's grading system (whatever that might be at any given moment).

I do find them to be far too generous on grading when it comes to o/c cards, but are pleasantly strict when it comes to fairly assigning very low grades to cards that would otherwise look really great if not for something like a small tape stain on the back. I think we're all tired of nearly everyone else overgrading such cards, but these guys don't!




j̜̬̺̆̓̓̾͝͡ơ̷̦̝̟̺̯̈͞_͇̜̳͙̭̏ͩ̓͗̐ͤ̀͌̌d̡̛̟̫̣͇̂ͮͧ̈́̇͝͡ ̴̡̹͕̪͍͚̻̾̀͋͛̿ͤi̷̷̠̦̯̞̜̪͕̭̖͛̀̐ͯͮͮ̾́͌̅̋̇͞ͅ ḃ̴̧̢͙̼̦͚̜͉̱̳̝͓͙́ͦ̑͗̀̓ͭ̉͐̽̅̕͢͡i̧͖̭̹̯̝̜̤̺̓̋̏̀̄ͪ͂ͪ̓̌ ̷̶͙̗̫̣̖̜̐ͥ̄̎ͧ̍̏́ͮ͜͜͝r̫̔̏͌k̹͙ͪͪ̎̍͢_̴̶̡̪̜͕͈͔͛ͤͩ̾̌ͯ̚͞ ̷̬̭̩͚̑̑̍́ͮ̉ͬͫ͠ḩ̴̛̭̲͓͓͚̱͓̣̳͕̺ͩ̌́ͣ̏̒͑̋̐̉͐͋̔͛̿́͘͘͞͡͞ ͎̦̈̑͒̓ͅo̵͇͕̳ͤ̄̋̈̔̔l̴͖̖͉̺ͩ̉̈́͡m̨̧̘͔̫̹͖̎͐ͫ̆̂͗̅̓̕ ̹_̚