Quote:
Originally Posted by sreader3
Thanks for your response. These are fair points. Here is my reply:
1) In my opinion, it is an ugly card. Let me cite the T206 Lajoie (With Bat) for comparison.
2) In my opinion, it is hard to decipher the signatures. Let me cite Harmon Killebrew's signature for comparison.
3 & 4) I don't believe that "UD Exquisite logomen" has achieved status in the hobby anywhere near N172, T206, 1933 Goudey or 1952 Topps. Or any other Topps set for that matter. I have never heard of it until you mentioned it. But I don't rule-out that "UD Exquisite logomen" might be more popular. Let's take a poll!
And I certainly do not think that collecting and investing are mutually exclusive!
|
Yeah, I don't think any of us are the intended market for this card. High-end modern basketball collectors are a wild bunch.