Quote:
Originally Posted by ThomasL
Ok thats possible, now give a reason to lie about that as it relates to his civil suit. Have you read the 1924 testimony?
It is also possible for people to tell the truth.
|
Oh for sure. I'm just saying, the testimony isn't definitive proof regarding this auto. It could just as easily be false as it could be true. His literacy had been a well-worn argument even back then (as you can tell by the mere fact that the testimony was elicited by the lawyers at all). It's entirely possible that whole angle was exaggerated in the courts and the media for obvious reasons. You really can't think of any reason he might want to play up his illiteracy?