View Single Post
  #22  
Old 06-12-2025, 07:22 AM
Johnny630 Johnny630 is offline
Johnny MaZilli
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,324
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by particra17 View Post
Marketing is exactly the type of function that PSA is going to kill first. Any horizontal function that is duplicative of PSA is just extra cost.

It makes no sense for PSA to operate SGC as a competing brand. The cost to hold that up destroys the value accretion.

But PSA doesn't need to shutter the SGC brand; they just need to remove the incentive to use SGC as an true alternative to PSA and (effectively) rebrand it as a lower-cost, non-premium option with longer wait times and less resale viability. Essentially use it as a low-margin option for people who would never pay the premium price for PSA. What they don't want to do is have it cannibalize PSA's existing share. That's a disaster.
To many important big piece cards that are owned by prestigious collectors reside in SGC Slabs with RECORD SALES. They will never be considered as non premium price pieces to PSA.

The only way this could change in my mind is if PSA Crosses those Big Cards Owned By the Important people at equal even grades.

Last edited by Johnny630; 06-12-2025 at 07:25 AM.
Reply With Quote