Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
Not even man enough to own it now?
|
You bet! No where in that post did I mention "child". I said people, and children aren't defined as "people" in every way - one of those being the age of consent. I explicitly said "consent" and you admitted that minors can't give consent:
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
14 year old children can’t give meaningful consent.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
So what sexual mores involving Rose do you have "no problem with" as a part of your political outlook? The only one being discussed, which you leaped to defend, was Rose's history with 12-16 year old girls.
|
No. You're assuming I believe he's guilty of something or other with an underage girl. My only opinion ever in legal matters is that a person is innocent until and unless convicted in a court of law.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
You know damn well that was what was being discussed lol.
|
I do indeed. But you're the one who's willing to make the assumptions regarding Rose's doings and guilt. I'm not in this or any case willing to accept unproven allegations as proof of guilt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
At least have a better cover story when you finally realize the pedo shit is a bad look.
|
Like I say, I'm too tough-minded to give a damn about "looks". Screw that. The logical principle is my sole concern.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
It's Wednesday here. There is a thing called timezones.
|
That too is strictly jurisdictional so I'll use my own.
