Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
If my stance against, let me check my notes here, *grown men violating children*....
|
You might also check the facts while you're at it. That's
your phrase.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
14 year old children can’t give meaningful consent. The accusations against Rose go as low as 12.
|
Mere
accusations do not imply guilt. Much more is required. Until then a person is innocent. In other words, cut the crap. To say that Pete Rose was guilty of having sex with children is just plain wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
Astonishing this need be said and people want to debate it. Well maybe not astonishing, but disgusting none the less.
|
You're right. I am indeed astonished that there are people who cavalierly disregard the presumption of innocence which acts to protect us all from politically motivated prosecution by the State.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
Disgusting was a polite understatement you probably don’t merit.
|
My take too on those who equate allegations with guilt.
But you seem to be all hot and bothered by my arm's length "Dunno, don't care, he's innocent until proven guilty and it's all beside the point anyway when it comes to the Baseball Hall of Fame" attitude when it comes to Pete Rose and these allegations. Why? Curious indeed if I do say so myself.
