Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
|
A lot of lawyering go on here. Defendant argued in NJ that NY case should proceed because it was filed first, then argued in NY that the NJ court is the proper forum. NJ court stayed its action pending the outcome in NY.
The decision to not have the matter proceed on parallel tracks is proper, if only to avoid potential inconsistent or contradictory results. So now we turn to New Jersey, which may or may not have publicly available filings.
Nothing of substance accomplished yet that can be seen of record, as far as I know anyway.
EDITED TO ADD I should say that there has been no decision on the merits of the claims. However, the NJ court already imposed injunctive relief. As I read it, defendant argued that they pulled lots from their auction and none are about to be sold at this time.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal
Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President.
Last edited by nolemmings; 05-07-2025 at 11:12 AM.
|