Quote:
Originally Posted by edhans
My main point is that a willing buyer and a willing seller should be sufficient to establish a "market value". We shouldn't require validation in the form of a third party underbidder. I don't think the presence of shill bids creates imperfect information. That is, it doesn't change what the buyer is willing to pay. On the flip side, we may conclude that some values presented in price trackers are deflated, since the buyer may have gone even higher, but didn't need to since there was no underbidder.
I do hope everyone understands that I do not condoning shill bidding. Just pointing out that its effect on "market value" may be somewhat overstated.
|
But if the sale isn't real because the high bidder was a shill bidder, then the reported values are inflated because no real buyer was willing to pay that much.