Jeter - 2,747 games
Trout - 1,533 games
If I could have eithers career on a team, as that career has actually happened and actually existed in the observable real world and not a hypothetical that does not exist in reality, I would probably take Jeter right now. I can fill SS with a star for 2 decades, or have Trout missing half the games but providing much more value in the games he does play.
If we mean the player at their absolute best, it is Trout and not even close.
If it means comparing Jeter to a guess of what Trout's full career will end up being, who knows.
As Trout has played more games than Betts and has been better than Betts, I would take Trout, assuming considering their actual careers as they have happened in reality to date.
Going forward, I'd probably take Betts if both were free agents and I could sign one.
Gazing into a crystal ball and attempting to divine the future to arrive at total career values, I would guess Betts will end up higher than Trout, due to the injuries. At their very best, it is unlikely Betts manages to surpass Trout's peak as Betts is 32 and going strong, but very unlikely to improve.
|