Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
There is an explanation in the auction itself.
Please note: this very example previously sold in our Summer, 2023 Premier Auction and was encapsulated as a Type III photo at that time. Over one year later a second example of this photo, with identical embedded editing, surfaced in the hobby which PSA determined to be a Type I photo. That photo ultimately sold elsewhere in September, 2024 in excess of $85,000. PSA then updated their opinion on the offered example, determining the embedded editing within both images is, in fact, a result of application to the original negative itself and not present due to use of a copy negative. A full LOA from PSA is included with this photo noting the critical distinction.
|
So PSA bungled the initial analysis and cost that first consignor how many thousands of dollars due to its (expensive) incompetence? Hey, PSA:
