View Single Post
  #13  
Old 03-31-2025, 11:58 AM
OhioLawyerF5's Avatar
OhioLawyerF5 OhioLawyerF5 is online now
Tim0thy J0nes
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 589
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Republicaninmass View Post
Au contraire counselor. Taking it reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Get those paralegals into OT!


And I quote from the 1st post.

"Tracking and a photo show delivery. Well, they did not come to me"


Apparently, the OP thought the tracking shows delivery, which it did not. This could be misconstrued, but he himself wrote the above sentence. Leading to the subsequent posts. Was it a photo of the tracking number? Who can tell. However, clearly his post says they were delivered elsewhere, followed up with not to him.

I don't believe they were delivered to anyone...yet.


The jury is out
Maybe you need to brush up on reading comprehension. Those were clearly claims seller was TELLING buyer, because buyer was quite clear in post 34 that prior to receiving the picture after making this thread, seller had not provided tracking, despite requests for it.

I love how you arrogantly attack my reading comprehension, while conveniently leaving out the part of the original post that said the seller refused to provide the tracking info or photo. :doh:

Last edited by OhioLawyerF5; 03-31-2025 at 12:00 PM.
Reply With Quote