Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas00
Maybe word your post better? I've never seen somebody lose their temper that fast and be so oblivious at the same time. It's obviously not clear that's what you meant in your first post. It looked like you were referring to the cards I posted about saying they were an honest attempt. Hence James post above clarifying.
|
It is not complicated. This is not a difficult line to follow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jingram058
If you're going to fake something, why change everything to make it patently obvious it is fake?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
Because these weren’t meant to deceive - these are from an early full reprint set that was an honest effort and never supposed to be confused with the originals.
|
The question is why every aspect of the reprint has been changed - and the answer, like it or not, is because this reproduction run was a legitimate one that was not meant to deceive people. No difficult words were used. That we are talking about the set is explicitly stated and included, not assumed in the on sentence statement.
Before you choose to play this game:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas00
So yes they were meant to deceive lol. Not sure how you got to "they weren't meant to deceive" if the back literally has the word reprint removed. Like I thought before, the real 1980s reprints have it clearly listed, shown here.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/25680501835...mis&media=COPY |
Make sure you read the post you are trying to correct and mock correctly.