Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark17
I'm curious. If
1. You had a unique item of a former player, let's say a vintage game used jersey
2. You list it for $1000, then go to a movie
3. When you return home, you have 2 people wanting to buy it. The first, timestamped at 7:30, is an auction house that will buy to flip. The second, timestamped a couple minutes later, is from the player's son. Turns out the player passed away the previous week and the family is in mourning.
Would you hold to your rigid, dogmatic principle of how pure and efficient markets should work (first offer to buy gets the cheese,) or take a more human approach?
|
Well given the nature of this forum I would
effectively be receiving both offers at the same time. Moreover given the inefficiencies introduced by living my life and other people living theirs, there can be no rational expectation that everyone sees my offer at the instant I post it. Therefore I would choose the player's son instead of the known flipper. Quite simply, I'd have the very good reason:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregndodgers
Absent a good reason, an individual cannot simply choose whom to sell to.
|
But I would make my decision immediately at the time choosing from among the PM's I'd received.
