Quote:
Originally Posted by Huysmans
1. So if anyone engaged finds someone who is a "willing participant", that alleviates the guilt and blame for cheating? 
2. Who cares that he "pursued" her. SHE was the one engaged to a man she obviously never loved or even liked - just for his money and security. So painting Jack as the one here at fault is ridiculous.
3. Doesn't matter if he would have accepted it, she never even attempted to offer, showing yet again Rose only cared for Rose. "I saw people starving on the street, but I knew they would have too much pride in accepting charity, so I ate everything myself" lol
4. Jack was a shitty artist? According to who? You by your own admission are apparently the last person who could spot talent. And even if that was true, Rose was dishonest and pretended otherwise, yet another slight on her character. |
I'm gonna bow out now. Wasn't expecting serious responses to my completely un-serious statements about a mostly un-serious movie (despite it's harrowing general topic).