I am consistently against idiots.
I spoke to the OP the 2nd day all of this trash was posted. I knew then that it's a big nothing-burger and should in no way affect the auction closing the next day. That is why it was moved. Plus it is explicitly against the rules to do what the OP did as his first post. It could have been deleted and that would have probably been the right thing to do.
If I were the AH I might just sue the OP. He knew exactly what he was doing and waffles back and forth on all kinds of stuff. He is totally in the wrong here, imo.
He had already spoken to lawyers, he told me, and no one would take it. That is because the whole thing is a bunch of crap. Lawyers will take good cases, most times.
And if I hear "evidentiary" again I might explode.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
You misread the thread, 'friend'.
I am consistently against hiding inconvenient threads and lying, and also consistently in favor of evidence. That is not in the ballpark of a contradiction. To believe a contract does X or Y, one should....look at the contract. If there is an alleged usurious bill in violation of the contract, one should... look at the contract and the bill. Apparently this is not common sense and is problematic for some folks agendas.
|