Oh, what the hell
Late to the party, but it seems like this is a good situation to throw out Hitchens’ razor - and I think it applies to both sides on this one:
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
On one side, you have someone who, by accounts posted here, is an experienced, educated collector who came here with delayed regrets and allegations of deceitful practices by long-standing auction professionals. On the other side, a denial of said deceit, albeit through a third-party, but without further clarification beyond a contract that looks like it was drafted by a first year law student (who would’ve gotten a crap grade on it).
Looks like none of the parties to this s-show care to further elaborate.
|