Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark17
Would the prior line, stating no additional fees, contradict (or negate) that final line?
Also, on that last line, who pays the 60% and who pays the 40% isn't specified. In other places, the consignor GETS the 60%. Does that final line imply the consignor gets, or pays, the 60%?
Would that ambiguity create a legal loophole?
|
Maybe, but I doubt it.
I know lawyers look for detailed contracts but these are very basic. There is a clause somewhere in there that states your signature makes it a binding contract based on the terms agreed to or some statement like that.
I believe the consignor pays 60% of the authentication fees based on the way it is written but that is a guess on my part.