Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
I don't think it's inconsistent. MIN SIZE is supposed to be an objective determination. So that distinguishes it from just an opinion on whether it's a 4, or a 5. Knowing the prior grade, in this specific case, would raise some questions about the PSA grade beyond the usual ones.
And we'll see where the poll I posted comes out, though I would guess at least a significant minority will be in favor of disclosure.
|
That is the rub. Min Size is not assessed objectively AND each co has their own threshold they use when they are assigning that assessment.
I have 30 cards sitting here that were rejected for Min Size. Each of them measures exactly to factory specifications or is 1/128th short. None are trimmed.