Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowman
LOL. You're hilarious. In one breath you admit that the grading companies' assessments are unreliable and all over the place, yet in the next breath you want to pretend that they're meaningful. You can't have it both ways.
Also, LMAO at the usage of "adjudged" in this case. That's pretty funny in the context of the grade on a slab.
The only person getting screwed in this scenario is the guy who sent the card to SGC and sold it in that AUTHENTIC holder before getting a second opinion.
|
I don't think it's inconsistent. MIN SIZE is supposed to be an objective determination. So that distinguishes it from just an opinion on whether it's a 4, or a 5. Knowing the prior grade, in this specific case, would raise some questions about the PSA grade beyond the usual ones.
And we'll see where the poll I posted comes out, though I would guess at least a significant minority will be in favor of disclosure.