Of course you can posit a set of facts which would show good faith by the seller. However, you stated as a general proposition in post 18 that as long as a seller SAYS he is acting honestly, he would NEVER have a duty to disclose. Goalposts moving.
Your own words:
"So as long as the seller (non-merchant) says they were acting honestly, that should be sufficient.
The bottom line: unless I’m told differently, I’m not sure that non-merchants have a duty to disclose material facts (I.e., facts that could change buyer’s decision to buy a card)."
Bottom line for me, if you trim a card and sell it to me without disclosing it, it makes no difference if you are a merchant or non-merchant, it's fraud.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby:
No consequences.
Stuff trumps all.
The flip is the commoodity.
Animal Farm grading.
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 01-13-2025 at 04:20 PM.
|