View Single Post
  #1  
Old 01-11-2025, 05:58 PM
p1ayba11 p1ayba11 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 28
Default How Did I Do With These Regradings?

Hi all,

In recent months I went on a mission to buy low grade T206 portraits of Walter Johnson, Christy Mathewson, and Cy Young where I felt the frontside looked considerably better than the grade. In each instance, the reason for the lower grade was some relatively minor ink or markings on the back. Two of the cards were PSA so automatically carried the MK qualifier, the other was SGC. After purchasing, I submitted to SGC for grading as feel the T206 cards just look so much better in the SGC holder. Also, SGC doesn’t do qualifiers so now have just pure grades. Pics below show the cards as I bought them and then after regrading. Just curious of everyone’s thoughts? Was this a fools errand? Did I improve the value of these cards individually and/or as a group? Do minor marks on the back impact your purchasing decisions? Thanks for any feedback.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0411.jpg (193.3 KB, 698 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0412.jpg (193.7 KB, 692 views)

Last edited by p1ayba11; 01-11-2025 at 06:01 PM.
Reply With Quote