Why a 24 card set.
butchie t : I know you have asked some of the same questions about the Baseball Card Society letter,( BCS). The same letter you brought you cards from.
The letter says: "The 1947 Homogenized Bond set, which was printed for only one year, contained 48 cards in all (44 baseball players and 4 boxers. We purchased the best of the set--24 cards in all---from the dealers's widow."
Butch we know your cards have white backs, therefore I believe your cards to be from the original 1947 square card print. It also appears that the 48 card set from BCS is the same as the 48 Bond Bread set, round corner cards (die-cut cards). Both of these sets, square and round, were produced and issued in 1947. Now on top of that it is believed that the Festberg cards were also produced in 1947.
So many questions:
OK, BCS purchased the best of 24 cards from a 48 card set from a dealer's window. If only we could find out who that dealer was? How did it become that the 24 card set from BCS was the exact same cards as the 24 card set from the Festberg find?
Did BCS pick the best of 24 cards from a 48 card set... because they did not like the 24 card set (Festberg)cards? BCS had to be looking for cards to sell. Just maybe BCS saw the 24 card set, but because of the paper stock and the print quality pick 24 cards out of that 48 card set. So it is possible they did see the cards from the 24 card set from Festberg but liked the 24 cards from the 48 card set better. Could this be why the two sets have the same Images. That was a mouth full to say, I hope I made my point.
Why does the 24 set (Festberg) match the 24 cards from BCS? Why and when did the 24 card set (Festberg find) get issued? Wait, I should ask, when they were printed? Because they were never issued. Why were only 24 cards out of the 48 card set printed? If it was a 48 card set to begin with, meaning was the Festberg find a 48 card set? We know from the BCS letter - it was a 48 card set.
Could it have been a licensing issue, or because BCS said they pick the best out of the 48 card set to sell. Maybe the printer or the people responsible for the printing of the 24 card set (Festberg) believe they were the best of the 48 card set, because of what BCS had said. Did they believe it would be much easier to promote and sell a 24 card set.
Why even a 48 card set? A 48 card set was the standard number of a trading card set. This is most likely because of the printing process and the size of the press that was used to print trading cards. The size of the press determined how many cards would be laid-out and ganged up on a printing plate. Meaning 48 cards were printed on one sheet of paper. Thus, if you ran 5,000 sheets of paper through the printing press, you would have yielded 48 cards of 5,000 each, producing 240,000 total cards.
My assessment of why a 24 card issue: It could have been a licensing issue. But I believe it is because a 24 card set would be cheaper and easier to produce. Most likely they were run on a smaller printing press, one that would produce 24 cards on a sheet of paper. Therefore if the prees run was 5,000 sheets of paper, it would yield 5000 cards of 24, producing 120,000 cards total.
I do have some questions! If BCS picked the 24 best cards out of the 48 card set: How did they decide what was the best of the best of 48? Where are the other 24 cards with white backs? We only see the same old square cards whether they come from BCS or Festberg cards. Somebody had to collect the other 24 names in the 48 white backs square set. I have seen some of the cards out there but come few and far in between and come at a higher price. It may be because usually these cards are slabbed and graded by grading companies. John
|