View Single Post
  #7  
Old 01-01-2025, 12:17 PM
Huck Huck is offline
d.ean
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 828
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dgo71 View Post
To me it seems like one of those fads that will die out through the generations. Back in the 80s getting a pricey RC signed was taboo, and 8x10s were extremely popular.
Agreed. In the early 80's when I reentered the hobby, defacing a card with a signature was a hobby niche. Any card with an added signature could never be considered mint. I marvel at those collectors who collect signed sets (ex. 1987 Topps) but personally, signed cards is just not my thing. I do have a dozen or so signed cards, only because I wanted the player sitting next to Brooks Robinson at a freebie event to have something to sign.

I do like certain autographed sets. I collect the 2000 Fleer Greats of the Game (FGOTG) autographed set (down to 2-3 cards). I am still on the fence whether the Jeter should be considered part of the set. This would have to be verified but the 2000 FGOTG may have the most on-card hof autographs of any set. I also like the look of 2005 UD SP legendary cuts sets. Due to the one of ones this set would be near impossible to complete.
__________________
Successful Transactions: perezfan, camaro69, dhicks67, Ed_Hutchinson, jingram058, LACardsGuy
Reply With Quote