Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowman
I agree with everything you said here. But all of that still has nothing to do with my claim. Like I said above, we're just talking past each other. You know damn well what I'm saying, you are just too stubborn to admit that I have a valid point. If you were hired to defend the argument that someone accepting a plea deal does not have the same implications as someone being tried by a jury of a specific charge and found guilty, you'd surely be able to come up with a compelling argument.
|
I actually don't know at all what you're saying because you make no sense. There is no compelling argument for anything you said about Mastro's guilty plea. I made it very clear why Mastro's guilty plea - without any out for him to claim that a jury got it wrong or he was unfairly convicted -- is actually more powerful than a conviction after jury trial. You're not a lawyer, you've never been inside a courtroom, you've got no idea what you're talking about. You just are one of those guys who thinks he knows everything when in fact you don't know shit.
I don't know why you continue to double down on this but I have to think there's something wrong with your brain. And next time you want to attack me in a thread, just be aware that I'm going to continue to bring up this idiocy of yours.
Ok, I'm done with this. You've done some fine litigating and I see a bright future in criminal defense for you. But at this point it's a disservice to anyone who is forced to read this.