Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
I've answered this, but again, my assumption is some kid used to grading shiny stuff is not familiar with vintage and mistook some tiny thing that should not be marked down for at all, like a print speck, or something that's a normal feature of the paper stock, as a major problem. If it was one card, I could see your point. It was the whole sub as I have said many times but people just ignore. Like I missed something on 30 consecutive cards? Sorry, no.
|
One question and one comment...
Q. Did they upcharge you (after the fact) on any of the 30 shitty grades?
C. It appears that they've already gone the way of PSA. Merger is in full swing now, and they don't want any variance between the two divisions.