Quote:
Originally Posted by gunboat82
OK, now I think SGC is just trolling. After they misidentified my 1931 W502 #29 Ruth the first time, they agreed to take it back for another label.
Here’s their second try:
Tony Lazzeri is #29 in that set, not Ruth. I’m not sure who’s doing the research over there now, but they’re looking in all the wrong places.
|
More evidence of SGC's descent into the abyss.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/15648576778...7789&recoPos=1
This one was graded last year, but somehow they slabbed a plain ol' W519 unnumbered Ruth as the rarer Type 2 #20 variation. As with my recent W502 and W511 submissions, I don't know how SGC manages to screw up the distinction between numbered and unnumbered cards. It doesn't even require special expertise -- just the gift of sight.