Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
I don't understand why you say you don't care and yet keep trying to have a personal beef, even after conceding you can't find any argument against my claim. If you don't care, then move on. If you do care, than make a reasonable argument . I don't get why you are so upset over a claim you can't even counter. Why do you so badly want me to debate something else with you?
What math would we be talking about if not the math of my claim? Its pretty obvious.
What logic if not the logic of my arguments and statements in this thread? If it's about another topic, then go argue in that other topic.
|
First, I don't know what you think is happening here, but I am not arguing what you seem to think I am. I am not upset in the slightest, by your claim. I'm not sure why you seem to think I am. I think you want someone to argue with your claim so bad you believe anyone who says something to you is challenging your claim.
Second, what you call using math, I call reading a statline on a website. Quit pretending you are doing any calculations. That's why I said it doesn't mean what you think it means. I was taking a jab at your repeated claims of using math, when you aren't using math at all.
The logic comment was in direct reference to your argument about use of Bill James' list.
For someone who likes to refer to the transcript, you sure don't pay much attention to it.