View Single Post
  #3  
Old 10-30-2024, 12:00 PM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John1941 View Post
BR explained in 2010 how it calculated pre-1975 saves: https://www.baseball-reference.com/b...ives/7371.html
"For 1920-1949, saves are awarded on the "encyclopedia basis": a pitcher who finished a game his team won, but did not get the win himself, is awarded a save. This policy is so named because it was used by the first Big Mac encyclopedia and later by Pete Palmer.
For 1950-1968, the policy is to use the 1969 rule (the first official one) and apply it retroactively. However, David Smith of Retrosheet admits that it hasn't been applied as rigorously to these seasons as the encyclopedia rule was applied to 1920-49, so there may be instances where saves were or were not awarded precisely according to the 1969 rule.
For post-1968 seasons, the rule in place at the time is used."

I presume this hasn't fundamentally changed.

The 1969 rule says: "The relief pitcher must enter the game with a lead and hold it. He can be taken out of the game only for a PH or PR. If more than one pitcher qualifies, the scorer gives it to the 'most effective' one."
The 1974 rule says: "The relief pitcher must face the potential tying or winning run at the plate or on base, or pitch effectively for at least three innings, and in either case preserve the lead. Same as #3 above, one save per game, given to the most "effective" reliever."
The save rule beginning in 1975 is the one we all know and love today.

The explanation doesn't address pre-1920 saves, but presumably they calculate them the same as 1920-49.
Thank you. Very helpful. And one can only imagine the level of stress that must have been going though Bobby Shantz' mind when he was asked to come in and hold a 13 run lead with two outs to go.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal
Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable

If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote