
10-20-2024, 07:33 PM
|
 |
Peter Spaeth
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 33,684
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark17
The word "cleaning" needs to be better defined to make any sense in determining if it necessitates disclosure. For instance, if I have a stack of cards that sits on a shelf for a couple years, then decide to sell them, I may have to wipe a thin layer of dust off the top card. Technically, that's cleaning it. Does that need to be disclosed at risk of committing a criminal act?
The natural state of the Topps cards I collected in the 1960s came in wax packs. Sometimes the gum was lightly stuck to a card, and I altered that original, from-the-factory natural state by separating the gum from the card.
Often, powdered sugar residue might be in a card, and I'd wipe it off. If there was wax residue on a card back it left a stain and there wasn't much I could do, but if it was on the glossy side, I removed wax by rubbing it with a cloth.
It's a slippery slope, which is why I say the word "cleaning" is much too ambiguous.
|
I agree, and it needs to be tempered by both common sense and historical practice.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.
My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at
https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 10-20-2024 at 07:34 PM.
|