Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5
That would go over well at trial as I parade so many sportscards experts and collectors to the stand that the judge has to cut it off. Juries find it very powerful when a judge has to say, "Ok, we get it, no need for more testimony."
|
I only mentioned the survey as the reason he thinks he understands how a jury would view things. I think he also said that no jury would ever convict someone of TRIMMING and then not disclosing, so it's not just cleaning, but he can correct me if I remember that wrong. This was his theory of why the feds dropped the investigation, because no jury would find trimming then concealing to be a crime.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby:
No consequences.
Stuff trumps all.
The flip is the commoodity.
Animal Farm grading.
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 10-20-2024 at 07:16 PM.
|